When we perform joint actions such as clinking glasses, playing a piano duet, or rowing a canoe together we often need to include others into our planning, to adjust our actions temporally and spatially to one another, and to follow through until reaching a joint goal.
Our research on planning investigates whether we include others’ actions in our planning even when we don’t need to, in which detail others’ actions are represented, and whether joint plans can override individual plans. Our studies on coordination ask how we coordinate with others by using the environment, by modifying our own performance to become more predictable, and by simulating others’ actions using our motor system. A new research line on commitment investigates when and why people expect each other to contribute and to go through with joint actions.
The coordination required for joint actions is often facilitated by communication. Focusing on non-verbal communication our research addresses how people modulate instrumental actions to communicate, how communication is shaped by the use of different sensory systems, and how communication systems can be bootstrapped from simple coordination problems.
Engaging in joint action also provides opportunities for teaching and learning and thus forms a potential basis for cultural transmission. We investigate 1) whether the need for interpersonal coordination in joint action creates learning opportunities that go beyond demonstration; 2) how teacher scaffold learners through joint action; and 3) how joint action is transmitted from group to group.
When two people look at the same situation they do not necessarily see the same thing because of their differing perspectives. This raises three questions that we address in our research: 1) (how) do people keep track of differences in their own and others’ perceptions; 2) how does people’s perception change depending on what others see and what attentional relations they are in; and 3) how do people integrate information from others who have different perspectives?
An important question in action research is whether we use the same representations or the same kind of representations when we perform actions, imagine others acting, and perceive others acting. We address this question by asking how planning actions affects perception, whether motor laws hold in imagery and perception, and whether people are best at recognizing and predicting their own actions. Given that many findings show a large overlap between action perception, imagery, and production the question arises how and under which conditions people can tell apart the perceivable consequences of their own and others’ actions. We address this question in our experiments on the sense of control and the sense of agency.
When trying to solve difficult problems people often reach impasses where no solution is in sight. Then, all of a sudden, the solution appears to them, often making the effort invested in previous systematic attempts seem wasted. Our research investigates why people reach impasses, how impasses are overcome, and why insights are experienced as sudden and not under the problem solver’s control.
Many ‘Sombies’ have interests in research topics other than the above. These range from turtles and affordances to empathy and finger tapping.